If We knew back then when TAX started, that a Person is not Human

As we all NOW know that a human is not a legal person. If we knew back in 17th century medieval times to non-comply , would there have been TAX  by monarchs .
And how much control do we have over how they are used!  the Petition of Right which among other measures, prohibited the use of taxes without the agreement of Parliament,  But it does mention with agreement of persons/citizens.

it was abolished by Henry Addington during the Peace of Amiens. Addington had taken over as prime minister in 1801, after Pitt’s resignation over Catholic Emancipation. The income tax was reintroduced by Addington in 1803 when hostilities recommenced, but it was again abolished in 1816, one year after the Battle of Waterloo. The United Kingdom income tax was reintroduced by Sir Robert Peel in the Income Tax Act 1842.

And Yet NOW it has been discovered that the UK Monarch is not Rightful

Follow on Twitter

Advertisements

Keep Calm & Be Anonymous

See how the officer Fails to get name of “legal person”. And failed to apply a legal rule which is not Law. Caution failed as no legal person, just a human being. I stated that I claim Common Law Rights as set from the Magna Carta.
He can not keep a straight face as they are fooling the public. !
Only a slave would fill in this info. The propaganda says its used for info. Infact its used for commercial purposes. Not forgeting who got the contract for it… and only a “PERSON” can fill these in, not a Free Human.

http://human-existence-behavior.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/census-lawful-non-consent-uk-playlist.html
“PERSON” is deaf dumb and blind (Birth cert).
Not ordered buy JC but ordered buy the UKPLC and Lockhead Martin

“Haven’t you heard it’s a battle of words” pink floyd

Follow Scandals , News, secrets and the truth https://twitter.com/Anonymous2Truth

Follow on Twitter  anonymous2truth

Legal Person Fiction

Capitalization Rules & legal fiction – Why Names are in CAPS?

by anonymous2truth on Thursday, 07 April 2011 at 12:20

Many people are involved in diligent research concerning the use of all capital letters for proper names, e.g.,

JOHN PAUL JONES as a substitute for John Paul Jones in all court documents, driver’s licenses, bank accounts, birth certificates, etc.. Is the use of all capital letters to designate a name some special English grammar rule or style? Is it a contemporary American style of English? Is the use of this form of capitalization recognized by educational authorities? Is this an official judicial or U.S. government rule?

And/or style of grammar? Why do attorneys, court clerks, prosecutor’s judges, insurance companies, banks, credit card companies, utility companies, etc. always use all capital letters when writing a proper name?

So hear is the grammar Rule for how to write names…

1. Names of people

This one may seem obvious, but there’s also a catch. Of course, you capitalize the first letters of a person’s first, middle and last names (John Quincy Adams), but you also capitalize suffixes (Jr., the Great, Princess of Power, etc.) and titles. Titles can be as simple as Mr., Mrs. or Dr., but they also apply to situations wherein you address a person by his or her position as though it’s their first name. For example, when we talk about President Lincoln, we are using his role as though it were a part of his name. We don’t always capitalize the word president. Indeed, we could say, “During the Civil War, President Lincoln was the president of the United States.”

It seemed that these particular grammatical experts had no idea why proper names were written in all caps.

Law is extremely precise. Every letter, capitalization, punctuation mark, etc., in a legal document is utilized for a specific reason and has legal (i.e. deadly force) consequences.

All Caps in Email – within contemporary – modern – English, an electronic message, a.k.a. e-mail, in capital letters. They say it’s “screaming” to do so. By standard definition, we presume that is the same as shouting or yelling. Are all

The Authorities shouting at us when they corrupt our proper names in this manner?

The reason behind the use of all caps when writing a proper name. The US and State Governments are deliberately using a legal fiction to “address” the lawful, real, flesh-and-blood man or woman. We say this is deliberate because their own official publications state that proper names are not to be written in all caps. They are deliberately not following their own recognized authorities.

In a nutshell, fabricated legal persons such as “STATE OF TEXAS” can be used to fabricate additional legal persons.  However, a law can never originate from a fictional foundation that doesn’t exist.

I extracted to save time some content from this link below.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/6967949/The-Legalities-of-AllCapitalLetters-Names-your-drivers-license